104 degrees...
That's what The Weather Channel says will be the high in Philly today. I'm seriously hesitant to step outside for lunch.
If you haven't yet, go to:
http://www.climatecrisis.net/takeaction/
If you haven't yet, go to:
http://www.climatecrisis.net/takeaction/
posted by Matt Smith at 9:18 AM
13 Comments:
Have personal air conditioners been invented yet?
Dude, he's said 100 times that he's from Philly and not CT. Hell, he said it in his last post too. And if you'd ever bothered to read his profile, you'd know that too. Besides, how many of the pro-Lamont bloggers are actually from CT? Is Kos? Nope, California? Chris Bowers? Oh wait, he's from Philly, like LieberDem. Get real.
On the other thing...it is curious that he never has said he personally supports Lieberman. I actually don't think he's ever even specifically endorsed him, although Gerstein obviously has. Odd.
I'll be out of reach for the next few days...see you all after the primary.
Andrew Sullivan, popular conservative blogger writes...
If I were a Democrat, I'd support Joe Lieberman next week. I don't believe the agenda of Ned Lamont will help either the U.S. or the Democrats. But, then, I'm not a Democrat. At this point, I'd best be described as a conservative independent. And compared to this conservative independent, Lieberman has been ridiculously obsequious to a Republican president who has made an appalling hash of a vital war. The notion, advanced by Lieberman, that criticism of the president's war leadership is somehow inappropriate when the country is in danger gets it exactly the wrong way round, I think. It is precisely because the danger is still so great that criticism is so necessary. That's democracy's strength. You could understand, if not forgive, this abdication of leadership if Lieberman were bound by partisan loyalty to Bush. But he isn't. And even those who are - like Chuck Hagel and Lindsey Graham and John McCain and John Warner - have had more astringent criticisms of the the conduct of the war than Lieberman. My guess is that he's still lobbying hard to replace Rumsfeld later this year and, by all accounts, probably will. Any replacement for Rumsfeld can only help us win this war, and Lieberman's ethical compass, unlike Rumsfeld's, would perhaps mitigate some of the depravity enabled by Captain Queeg. But I can understand those Democrats who do not think it is their role next week to give Bush their party's cover for his war-mismanagement. I'd still back him myself; but it's silly to believe it's nuts for Dems to choose the other guy.
http://time.blogs.com/daily_dish/2006/08/the_lieberman_q.html
Check the timestamps - my new post was posted over an hour earlier.
Now back to work.
Wow, awfully quiet around here. Are there any Lieberman supporters left, except people officially connected with the campaign?
Seriously, not even Seedfreak is in sight.
Hello? Anyone here? Anything good to say about Joe Lieberman? I here rumors that he is going to give a big mea culpa on the War. Seriously. His own polls must look pretty depressing.
Where are these rumors? I haven't seen anything about them...
sniff... sniff... sniff... hmms... smells like something rotting or dying.
"Lieberman Plans for Loss"
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2006/08/02/lieberman_plans_for_loss_next_week.html
Lord Lieberman is the Dean Scream of 2006
Jane Hamsher has ALWAYS had problems with the truth. I find her blog a piece of garbage like a few more "left" blogs I could name.
The most depressing thing to me is that far too many on the "left" in the blogosphere are just as cavalier with the truth as those on the right. And they don't have to be.
Of course the people holding signs for Lieberman were from NJ and paid $60/day or members of the College Republicans.
<< Home